Hi All,
We have following requirement and I request community input on how to achieve this..
2. Populate these additional servers in the same group as above (group-1)
My approach
------------------
1. create a new discovery rule based on new registry key and seal it and import in SCOM (I have done this step)
2. export the existing sealed MP (from scenario -1) , Edit the xml and in Group population - dynamic member section add additional formula to include the new registry key.
Issue:
-------
I got stuck at step 2 in my above approach. I could not find the dynamic member section where I can add the new registry information. Is it stored in DB somewhere?
Suggestion welcome
------------------------------
If my approach is wrong, can anyone please advice me on how to implement the new requirement?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Sri
We have following requirement and I request community input on how to achieve this..
scenario - 1 (Existing ) :
------------------------
1. There is existing custom sealed MP, which has a discovery defined based on registry key. (eg. supported SQL servers based on registry entry 'abc')------------------------
2. A custom group (group-1) was defined to list these servers based on the the registry key value
3. Many custom monitors were defined and scoped to this group
scenario -2 (new requirement) :
------------------------
1. We need to discover additional set of servers based on separate registry key value ('xyz')------------------------
2. Populate these additional servers in the same group as above (group-1)
My approach
------------------
1. create a new discovery rule based on new registry key and seal it and import in SCOM (I have done this step)
2. export the existing sealed MP (from scenario -1) , Edit the xml and in Group population - dynamic member section add additional formula to include the new registry key.
Issue:
-------
I got stuck at step 2 in my above approach. I could not find the dynamic member section where I can add the new registry information. Is it stored in DB somewhere?
Suggestion welcome
------------------------------
If my approach is wrong, can anyone please advice me on how to implement the new requirement?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Sri